Eva Karcher h.o.m.e.

Jonas Burgert, auf Ihren Gemälden kriechen kahlköpfige, hohläugige Jammergestalten durch verwüstete Landschaften, das Licht ist fahl, die Farben psychedelisch – beschwören Sie die Apokalypse?

Nein, das sind keine Weltuntergangsbilder. Sie sind ernst. Aber sind nicht nur die unglücklichsten, sondern auch die schönsten Momente in unserem Leben ernst?. Wenn ich jemandem sage: „Ich liebe dich“, dann lache ich nicht dabei. Oder wenn ich in einer Landschaft bin, die mich umhaut – dann schweige ich.

Continue reading “Eva Karcher h.o.m.e.”

Heinrich Dietz – Rubble and Fodder

Heinrich Dietz

In contrast to reductionist tendencies in twentieth century art through which means, media, and parameters of artistic work were investigated, isolated, and sorted out, a contrary strategy is strikingly evident in your oeuvre: the maximum utilisation of a variety of those means which are traditionally available to painting. These include the representative function of painting – the figuration and construction of an illusionistic pictorial space –, borrowings from classical iconography and symbols, an extreme wealth of detail in the monumental paintings, but also composition, tonality, and modulation of the oil paints. What is the motivation for this assertive reactivation of painterly means?

Continue reading “Heinrich Dietz – Rubble and Fodder”

Jonas Burgert interviewed by Claudia Stockhausen

At the heart of your work lies a fascination with the grotesque, mystical and fantastic. Each painting is like a carefully constructed stage of an opera or circus, set up with dramatic lighting, exotic costumes, stage props and make-up. Shamans and magicians, giants and dwarfs, demons and harlequins, creatures dead and alive populate the artificial world you evoke. What is it that makes this subject matter so enthralling to you?

Continue reading “Jonas Burgert interviewed by Claudia Stockhausen”